The fact is the Facebook, Twitter, and any other Social Media companies need to be broken up and need to be regulated. Figures that Biden, coming from the administration that forced people to BUY healthcare I guess its not a stretch. The government does NOT have the power to mandate that you take any medication. This is why I do not want to take the vaccine until some more time passes by and we see results. They are always telling you, "if you don't click now, your account will be closed" etc. I work in the Information Security Business and when it comes to Phishing attacks, the one constant is an immediate call to action. In the Constitution of "these" United States under Article II explicitly defines what the Federal Government can do. Since before even big tech's take over, the Federal Government has left the reservation when it comes to powers. This books explains the abuse of Section 230 and how these tech giants have used it to corner the power that even exceeds that of the putrid Federal Government, which by the way was already abused. Again ironic that the Democrats have always been about breaking up monopolies however now that they have found a way to use them for their advantage, they are surprisingly fine with them. The book stars off with a history lesson about monopolies. Probably due to him outing Amazon as well for their fake woke practices. They hide the book from regular searches. I even had trouble finding this on Amazon's web site. Ironically the party of inclusion and anti-hate. Really anyone that supported or supports Donald J. It’s that scary.īTW, if you're in a book club, this would be great selection. And it should make you question what you are being shown and not shown by Big Tech.Įvery American should read The Tyranny of Big Tech-but don’t do it when you’re home alone. The Tyranny of Big Tech will make you rethink logging onto Facebook, doing a Google search or using your smart phone. The reach and influence of these companies is unparalleled, and most American are unware of how they are being psychologically manipulated and controlled. Simply put, tech users are being lied to and used by these companies for political and financial gain. He presents a well-researched, fascinating historical background and perspective to further the understanding of growth Big Tech monopolies and their impact and influence on the lives of everyday Americans as well our political system. Hawley equates Big Tech with the robber barons (e.g., the railroads, the banking & steel industries) of the Gilded Age. He is not anti-technology or anti-progress, he is against the power the monopolies have amassed and the manipulation and control they exert over an unsuspecting American public. He is not referring to technology in general. What Senator/Author Josh Hawley means by Big Tech is a cabal of specific tech companies (Facebook, Google, Apple, Amazon, Twitter). Let’s begin with defining “Big Tech” so there is no misunderstanding. i don't care if you are doing it because you run a writer on the left are those folks who came toĬommission would be useful but it has to be bipartisan and done on the framework in the pattern of the 9/11 commission which is not what the democrats have proposed, not what nancy pelosi is proposed she wanted to be partisan commission to wyatt's blog down there is no reason to introduce partisan politics into this we had have a clear look at the security failings, we had several rounds of hearings in the senate on the security failings on the day, those are pretty significant, we know for instance there was major controversy about activating the national guard, we know that some did not want the guard activated on the day because they thought it looked too much like president trump activation against the rioters in d.c.Big Brother is watching you, but it’s not the government, it’s Big Tech. it's wrong it's violent it's lawless and criminal. those who committed acts of violence and those who committed acts of crime on the day of them - january 6 they need to go to prison and i'll pay with their justification is. that's why raise the issue on that day and that i wasn't going to let the action of a lawless criminal mob who came to this capital and try to stop the certification process and tried to stop the debate that we were in the middle of i wouldn't allow their actions interfere with my application with my constituents and doing what i said i was going to do. i think it was appropriate to have it done by the way democrats debate was appropriate and certainly within their right to raise these issues and i promise promised my constituents that i wouldn't so i did. An objection of the state of arizona so we had debate on both of those in my view is this, we need to have a debate on election integrity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |